|
|
Effect of Accessory Retention Forms on the Bond Strength of Resin-bonded Fixed Partial Dentures: a 3D Finite Element Study |
HAN Jin-yong, WANG Chao, FAN Yu-bo |
Key Lab for Boimechanics and Mechanobiology of Education Ministry, School of Biological and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract Interface debonding between prostheses and abutments was the most frequent failure mode of resin-bonded fixed partials dentures (RBFPDs) in clinic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of accessory retention forms on the bond strength of RBFPDs. Three types of 3D finite element models were constructed. The model of posterior metal plate RBFPD with spoon-shaped occlusal rest seats served as the control. The remaining two types of models based on the control added the retention form design of the pin hole and axial groove respectively. The axial or buccolingual load of 150 N was applied on the prosthesis, first premolar and first molar respectively. The maximum principal stresses of the adhesive layer in different models were calculated. Under the load of the same magnitude, the stress due to the buccolingual load was significantly higher than that due to the axial load in the adhesive layer. The proximal shoulder, occlusal rest seats wall and the proximal margin adjacent to the shoulder were the high risk region where the adhesive layer damaged easily. Compared with the control model, the pin and groove models could slightly decrease the stress in the adhesive layer after the axial loading, while the stress in the adhesive layer drastically decreased after horizontal loading and reduced by 22% and 31% respectively. These results indicate that the horizontal occlusal force has a more serious harm to the debonding of RBFPDs. In addition, the accessory retention forms (e.g. pin and axial groove retention forms) can decrease the stress level in the adhesive layer, which are conducive to increase the load-bearing capacity of RBFPDs.
|
Received: 21 June 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
FAN Yu-bo. E-mail: yubofan@buaa.edu.cn
|
|
|
|
[1] Howe DF, Denehy GE. Anterior fixed partial dentures utilizing the acid-etch technique and a cast metal framework[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentisty, 1977, 37(1): 28-31. [2] Probster B, Henrich GM. ll-year follow-up study of resinbonded fixed partial dentures[J]. International Journal of Prosthodonics, 1997, 10(3): 259-268. [3] Corrente G, Vergnano L, Re S, et al. Resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and splints in periodontally compromised patients: a 10-year follow-up[J]. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 2000, 20(6): 628-636. [4] Kern M. Clinical long-term survival of two-retainer andsingle-retainer all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures[J]. Quintessence International, 2005, 36(2): 141-147. [5] Emara RZ, Byrne D, Hussey DL , et al. Effect of groove placement on the retention/resistance of resin-bonded retainers for maxillary and mandibular second molars[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentisty, 2001, 85(5): 472-478. [6] Imbery TA, Eshelman EG. Resin-bonded fixed partial den tures: a review of three decades of progress[J]. Journal of the American Dental Association, 1996, 127(12): 1751-1760. [7] Stokholm R, Isidor F. Resin-bonded inlay retainer prosthesesfor posterior teeth. A 5-year clinical study[J]. International Journal of Prosthodonics, 1996, 9(2): 161-166. [8] Kerschbaum T, Haastert B, Marinello CP. Risk of debonding in three-unit resin-bonded fixed partial dentures[J]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentisty, 1996, 75(3): 248-253. [9] Mudassir A, Aboush YE, Hosein M, et al. Long-term clinical performance of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures placed in a developing country[J]. Journal of Prosthodontics, 1995, 4(4):233-236. [10] Saunders WP. Resin bonded bridgework: a review[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 17(6): 255-265. [11] Creugers NH, Kayser AF, van't Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges[J]. Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology, 1994, 22(6): 448-452. [12] Creugers NH, Snoek PA, Van't Hof MA, et al. Clinical performance of resin-bonded bridges: a 5-year prospective study. Part III:Failure characteristics and survival after rebonding[J]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1990, 17(2):179-186. [13] Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Tan K, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years[J]. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008, 19(2): 131-141. [14] el-Mowafy O, Rubo MH. Retention of a posterior resinbonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: an in vitro study[J]. International Journal of Prosthodonics, 2000, 13(5): 425-431. [15] Priest G. An ll-year reevaluation of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures[J]. The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 1995, 15(3): 238-247. [16] Creugers NH, De Kanter RJ, Verzijden CW, et al. Risk factors and multiple failures in posterior resin-bonded bridges in a 5-year multi-practice clinical trial[J]. Journal of Dentistry, 1998, 26(5-6): 397-402. [17] Behr M, Leibrock A, Stich W, et al. Adhesive-fixed partialdentures in anterior and posterior areas. Results of an on-going prospective study begun in 1985[J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 1998, 2(1): 31-35. [18] Djemal S, Setchell D, King P, et al. Long-term survival characteristics of 832 resin-retained bridges and splints provided in a postgraduate teaching hospital between 1978 and 1993[J]. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 1999, 26:302-320. [19] Han J, Li Y, Fei R, et al. Three dimensional modeling of composite resin-bonded fixed partial dentures for FEA analysis[J]. Beijing Biomedical Engineering, 2006, 25: 231-234. [20] Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition[J]. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 1977, 35(6): 297-303. [21] van Eijden TM. Three-dimensional analysis of human bite force magnitude and moment[J]. Archives of Oral Biology, 1991, 36(7): 535-539. [22] Carlsson GE. Bite force and chewing efficiency[J]. Frontiers of Oral Physiology, 1974, 1(1): 265-292. [23] Raadsheer MC, van Eijden TM, van Ginkel FC, et al. Contribution of jaw muscle size and craniofacial morphology to human bite force magnitude[J]. Journal of Dental Research, 1999, 78(1): 31-42. |
|
|
|