Home        About Journal        Editorial Board        Instruction        Subscribe        Messages Board        Contact Us        
  Apr. 5, 2025  
Quick Search
Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering  2020, Vol. 29 Issue (3): 24-32    DOI:
Current Issue | Archive | Adv Search |
Comparison of Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma during Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy with and without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Zhaodong Fei1, Yi Li1, Xiufang Qiu1, Yingying Huang1, Li Li1, Chuanben Chen1,2
1. Department of Radiotherapy,Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital,Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital,Fuzhou Fujian Province 350014,China;
2. Department of Radiation Oncology,Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital,Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital,Fuzhou Fujian Province 350014,China
Download: PDF (295 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Objective Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) may experience significant volumetric and dosimetric variations throughout the treatment course. However,neoadjuvant chemotherapy may reduce the extent of these variations. This study was carried out to evaluate volumetric and dosimetric changes in target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) during IMRT in patients with locally advanced NPC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone or in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods 35 NPC patients were recruited for this study and divided into the NACT (n=15) and CCRT (n=20) groups. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy,before IMRT,before the 24th fraction of IMRT,and after treatment. The original plan (plan 0) was based on CT images collected before IMRT. Hybrid plan 1 (plan 1) and hybrid plan 2 (plan 2) were generated by applying the beam configurations of plan0 to the CT scans collected before the 24th fraction of IMRT and after treatment. Volumetric and dosimetric variations were assessed by comparing the results of plan 0 with those of plan 1 and plan 2. Results In the NACT group,compared with that in plan 0,the primary gross tumor volume (GTVnx) decreased by 33.2%±18.4% and 50.5%±12.6% in plan1 and plan 2,respectively. In the CCRT group,the corresponding reduction rates in plan 1 and plan 2 were 49.4%±8.0% and 77.8%±28.1%,respectively. The volume decrease rates in the NACT group were less than those in the CCRT group (P<0.001). In the NACT group,compared with that of plan 0,the dose to 95% of the volume (D95) for the planning target volume of the primary tumor (PTVnx) decreased by 1.0%±0.7% and 0.6%±0.6% in plan 1 and plan 2,respectively. In the CCRT group,the corresponding decrease rates in plan 1 and plan 2 were 4.2%±3.8% and 6.1%±6.3%,respectively. The decrease rate of D95 for PTVnx in the NACT group was less than that in the CCRT group (P<0.001). Similar results among the plans were found in terms of D99,Dmean,V93 for PTVnx and PTVnd,and Dmean for the parotid glands. Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy reduces the extent of volumetric and dosimetric variations in target volumes and OARs during IMRT and,thus,helps achieve better target volume coverage,protects adjacent important structures,and minimizes unnecessary replanning during radiotherapy.
Key wordsNasopharyngeal carcinoma      Intensity-modulated radiation therapy      Adaptive radiation therapy      Neoadjuvant chemotherapy      Concurrent chemoradiotherapy     
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Zhaodong Fei
Yi Li
Xiufang Qiu
Yingying Huang
Li Li
Chuanben Chen
Cite this article:   
Zhaodong Fei,Yi Li,Xiufang Qiu, et al. Comparison of Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma during Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy with and without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy[J]. Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 29(3): 24-32.
URL:  
http://manu32.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgswyx_en/EN/     OR     http://manu32.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_zgswyx_en/EN/Y2020/V29/I3/24
Copyright © Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering
Supported by:Beijing Magtech