|
|
Clinical Observation on the Effects of Different Doses of Tramadol lnjection for Preemptive Analgesia in Gynaecological Laparoscop |
YAO Qun1, YAO Li2 |
1. Anesthesiology Department, Municipal Hospital, Shandong Province Zaozhuang 277102, China; 2. Gynecological Department, Municipal Hospital, Shandong Province Zaozhuang 277102, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: To observe the analgesic effects of tramadol in general anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery. Methods: To operate 80 laparoscopic surgeries under the circumstance of general anaesthesia. Randomly divide them into 4 groups, with 20 cases in each group and the intravenous injection should be finished before the operation. Group Ⅰ: 2 ml normal saline; GroupⅡ: 1.5 ml/kg tramadol; Group Ⅲ: 2 mg/kg tramadol; Group Ⅳ: 2.5 mg/kg tramadol. Use VAS and Ramsay sedation marking system to assess the degree of pain-feeling and sedation in these circumstances: after pulling out oxygen hose, before leaving the operation room and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 h after the operation. Meanwhile, record such side effects as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, hypersomnia, restless, nightmares, itchy and sweating. Results: The VAS score was significantly lower within postoperative 8 h in Group Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ than that in Group I, while no significant difference was found among GroupⅡ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ at each time point. The postoperative Ramsay sedation score was 0-2 in each group. Incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and sweating were more in Group Ⅱ, Ⅲ and IV than that in Group I. Group Ⅳ and Group I have statistical differences, in which P<0.05 or P<0.01. However, GroupⅡ, Ⅲ and Group Ⅳ have no statistical differences. Conclusion The study suggests that preoperative injection of 1.5-2 mg/kg tramadol provides satisfactory preoperative analgesia in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy, reducing the use of analgesics and the incidence of side effects.
|
Received: 20 April 2016
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
YAO Qun, E-mail: wxs77777@163.com
|
|
|
|
[1] Luo Dong, Ma Yushan, Li Huafeng. 30 cases of tramadol application for postoperative analgesic in gynaecological laparoscopy[J]. Clinical Pharmacy, 2005, 14(1):66-67. [2] Celli BR,MacNee W,Agusti A,et al. Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper [J]. European Respiratory Journal, 2004, 23: 932-946. [3] Katz J, Mccartney C. Current status of preemptic analgesia[J]. Current Opinion in Anesthesiolgy, 2002, 15: 435-441. [4] Agusti AG. Systemic effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J]. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2007, 4(7): 522. [5] Aldrete JA, Kronlik D. A postanesthetic recovery score[J]. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 1970, 49(6) : 924-934. [6] Brug J, Schols A, Mesters I. Dietary change, nutrition education andchronic obstructive pulmonary disease[J]. Patient Education & Counseling, 2004, 52(3): 249-257. [7] 0zcengiz D, Gunduz M, Ozbek H, et al. Comparison of caudal morphine and tramadol for postoperative pain control in children undergoing inguinal hemiorrhaphy[J]. Paediatric Anaesthesia, 2001, 11(4): 459- 464 |
|
|
|