|
|
|
| Biomechanical Properties of Bilateral Puncture PVP and Unilateral Curved PVP |
| CHEN Tian-shun, OU Qing-bin |
| Zhangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhangzhou Fujian 363000, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of bilateral puncture PVP and unilateral curved PVP. Methods: Twenty old sheep spine models were taken as research specimens in this experiment, which were randomly divided into control group and experimental group, with 10 in each group. The specimens were made into a compressive spinal fracture model and treated with bone cement for vertebroplasty. In the control group, 1.5 ml of bone cement was injected into one side through bilateral puncture PVP. In the experimental group, a total of 3 ml of bone cement was injected through the unilateral curved PVP. The exudation of bone cement was observed and a CT examination was performed. Mechanical experiments were performed on the two groups of experimental specimens, and the compressive strength and stiffness of the two groups were counted and compared. Results: The initial height of the spine in the experimental group and the control group were (18.52±0.84) mm and (18.42±0.86) mm, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After compression, the height of the vertebral bodies decreased significantly in both groups. With (10.36±2.33) mm in the experimental group and (10.51±2.41) mm in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) compared with that before compression, and there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). After the PVP operation of the two groups, there was no bone cement exudation. The specimens in the control group had an ultimate compressive strength of (1752.52±55.21) N and a stiffness of (208.51±11.02) Nwm/m. The compressive strength and stiffness of the experimental group after PVP were: (3052.51±85.24) N, (235.25±10.35) Nwm/m. The difference was significant compared with the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: The use of PVP in the treatment of spinal osteoporotic compression fractures can effectively increase the compression resistance of the spine while restoring the anatomical structure of the spine, so mechanical requirements are met, and the surgical method is safe. Implementation of bone cement injection using unilateral curvature of the spine can result in better spinal compression resistance, which has high promotion and application value.
|
|
Received: 21 April 2022
|
|
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
OU Qing-bin.
|
|
|
|
[1] Kyriakou C, Molloy S, Vrionis F, et al.The role of cement augmentation with percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma: a consensus statement from the International Myeloma Working Group(IMWG)[J].Blood Cancer J, 2019, 9(3):27.
[2] Yao G, Shen YX, Li M, et al.Biomechanical effects of different bone cement diffusion patterns after vertebroplasty:finite element analysis[J].Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2021, 34(8):732-737.
[3] Zhang K, She J, Zhu Y, et al.Risk factors of postoperative bone cement leakage on osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective study[J].J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1):183.
[4] Gao T, Chen ZY, Li T, et al.Correlation analysis of the puncture-side bone cement/vertebral body volume ratio and bone cement leakage in the paravertebral vein in vertebroplasty[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1):184.
[5] Tang B, Cui L, Chen X, et al.Risk factors for cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: An analysis of 1456 vertebrae augmented by low-viscosity bone cement[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2021, 46(4):216-222.
[6] Park JS, Park YS.Survival analysis and risk factors of new vertebral fracture after vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].Spine J, 2021, 21(8):1355-1361.
[7] Zhang Z, Jing Q, Qiao R, et al.Risk factors analysis of adjacent fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2021, 35(1):20-25.
[8] Lu Q, Gao S, Zhou M.The effect of bone cement on the curative effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture[J].Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(10):11013-11023.
[9] Huang S, Zhu X, Xiao D, et al.Therapeutic effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty combined with anti-osteoporosis drug on postmenopausal women with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture and analysis of postoperative bone cement leakage risk factors: a retrospective cohort study[J].J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1):452.
[10] Xiao Q, Zhao Y, Qu Z, et al.Association between bone cement augmentation and new vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].World Neurosurg, 2021, 153(8):98-108.
[11] Wang M, Jin Q.High-viscosity bone cement for vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study on intravertebral diffusion and leakage of bone cement[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1):589.
[12] Lin TY, Liu YC, Wang YC, et al.Cement augmentation for single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: comparison of vertebroplasty with high-viscosity cement and kyphoplasty[J].World Neurosurg, 2020, 141(11):266-270. |
|
|
|
